IRCC Releases New Guidance on Resettlement Barriers — May 2026

Canada's Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) has set forth new procedures for processing refugee resettlement applications when applicants face barriers to exiting their host country. The updated guidance, released on May 12, 2026, addresses challenges such as lack of legal registration and costly exit permits. It's crucial for applicants and agents to fully understand these directives to avoid potential setbacks in the resettlement process.

This guidance primarily supports migration officers in communicating mandatory requirements like exit permits to applicants at the earliest stage possible. These updates aim to streamline the process and provide a clearer path towards resettlement for those affected by such exit barriers.

Understanding the Policy Change

The policy change centers around applicants experiencing obstacles in obtaining exit permits due to legal status issues in their host countries This can be due to a lack of legal documentation, suspension of registration processes, or high fees. In such scenarios, IRCC does not require proof of legal status or an exit permit to issue a permanent residency visa.

Migrants may be informed by officers during interviews about the necessity of obtaining an exit permit and the consequences of failing to do so. Correspondence in official communications now also includes guidance on meeting these exit requirements. This ensures applicants are well-informed about the actions they need to take to facilitate their resettlement.

Implications for Different Applicant Groups

Refugee Applicants: Those seeking resettlement in Canada who lack legal status in their host country now receive instructions on the importance of obtaining an exit permit. Failure to act on these instructions may result in closed cases if they cannot travel within the validity of their issued visa.

Dependants: In some cases, applicants' dependents might face even more severe exit restrictions. If this happens, and there is no imminent risk to their safety, families might need to consider resettlement options without the affected dependents under special provisions such as the One-Year Window (OYW) and Family Class programs.

Officers: Migration officers are provided with the discretion to place applications on hold temporarily if there is a reasonable expectation that the applicant can comply in a short duration, typically not exceeding six months. However they are responsible for timely processing and should avoid indefinite holds.

Steps for Applicants Facing Barriers

For applicants confronting significant hurdles, there are several actions advised. Initially, they should thoroughly understand any exit requirements and attempt to meet these early in the resettlement process. If an exit permit is difficult to obtain, it may be beneficial to discuss possible assistance with international agencies like the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

When the likelihood of securing an exit permit is low, applicants have the option to withdraw their application, which be initiated by themselves or their representative. If applicants believe their situation will improve shortly, they can request a temporary hold on their application instead of withdrawing it outright. Importantly, all medical exams must remain valid, and applicants should be prepared for re-evaluations if needed.

What This Means for Policy Context

The updated instructions aim to align IRCC's processing standards with real challenges faced by applicants. By focusing on procedural fairness, the policy modification ensures that officers do not demand documentation that is unreasonably difficult to procure. Instead, they provide assistance and clear guidance to applicants about what is needed and why.

This change follows a global trend of acknowledging the complexities involved in refugee resettlement and responding with flexible policies. It reflects Canada's commitment to supporting refugees, emphasizing the welfare and rights of individuals striving for a new beginning in Canada.

Consistent Aspects of the Resettlement Process

Despite these adjustments, certain base aspects of the resettlement process remain unchanged. Notably, the criteria for admissibility and grounds for approval are still rigorously adhered to. Migration officers continue to follow established procedures for final application decisions, ensuring consistency and fairness.

The requirement to acquire a valid visa before travel and the necessity for applicants to move before this visa expires also remains unchanged. This maintains a structured approach to managing refugee resettlement, ensuring that approved applications meet Canadian immigration requirements comprehensively.

Detailed Procedural Steps for Officers

The role of migration officers is pivotal in ensuring that applicants are thoroughly informed about the requirements related to exit permits and legal registration in the host country. Officers are advised to include pertinent information in the applicant's interview notes if the discussion occurs during an interview. Alternatively, if information is shared separately, such as in letters or calls, officers must update the Global Case Management System (GCMS) with a case note to ensure there is a clear record that applicants have been informed.

It's essential for officers to clarify the consequences of failing to meet exit permit requirements. Should an applicant receive approval for their resettlement application, their travel must occur before the connected visa expires. Understanding these timelines and ensuring applicants comprehend them is crucial to preventing unnecessary closures of their cases.

For cases where it becomes clear that an applicant might struggle to meet exit requirements, officers should communicate the option of application withdrawal. Withdrawal remains a personal decision that can be made by the applicant or their representative, and it provides flexibility if circumstances change significantly. The procedural guidance also advises officers against placing files on indefinite hold, stressing the importance of time-bound processing to uphold fairness and efficiency.

Potential Assistance from International Organizations

Though IRCC cannot influence exit permits directly, applicants can potentially seek support from international bodies such as the International Organization for Migration (IOM) and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). These organizations may provide guidance or assist in navigating the legal and regulatory challenges in host countries, especially in cases where exit permits or legal documentation is difficult to acquire.

For instance, the IOM has developed pathways for migrants who may require logistic, administrative, or financial aid during their route to resettlement. Similarly, the UNHCR offers legal assistance and advocacy, especially in regions where official assistance channels are limited. Candidates for resettlement are encouraged to reach out to these organizations proactively to leverage their vast resources and support networks.

Despite this potential support, it's essential to note the limitations. Neither IOM nor UNHCR is responsible for obtaining legal status or exit permits on behalf of applicants. The onus remains on the individual to consult these avenues as supplementary support rather than primary solutions.

Family Considerations in Resettlement Applications

Family circumstances add layers of complexity to resettlement processes, especially when some family members face legal or logistical barriers preventing exit from their current country. IRCC's policy avoids splitting families except when the situation is life-threatening or presents a considerable risk to safety.

Alternative routes like the One-Year Window (OYW) and Family Class applications can be considered in such cases. These pathways allow the principal applicants to proceed to Canada while providing a legal structure that may later facilitate family reunification once dependents are able to follow.

In these cases, migration officers are tasked with guiding the primary applicants through the available options, ensuring they are well aware of the potential for future reunification and the need to meet the requirements of these alternate programs. This ensures these decisions are made with a complete understanding of possible outcomes and responsibilities.

Enforcement of Resettlement Application Deadlines

The enforcement of resettlement application deadlines forms a critical part of the updated policy. Applicants are given clear timelines upon visa issuance, which allows preparation for their movement to Canada. It's emphasized that failure to adhere to these timelines, especially regarding the visa expiry, will result in the application being closed.

This approach, while firm, is designed to maintain the integrity of Canada's immigration processes. It highlights the importance of applicants fulfilling all necessary conditions timely to avoid disruptions. The call for timely action also places a focus on applicants making proactive decisions regarding their immigration plans, enhancing their readiness for resettling in Canada.

Working with set deadlines encourages applicants and officers alike to remain vigilant and responsive to any developments or changes in circumstance. It ensures a systematic processing pipeline and allocates energy towards applications most likely to succeed under current conditions.

About Author

I2C

See author's posts