207

Canadians Support Immigration Cuts: 2026 Leger Poll Results

A new Leger poll released in 2026 reveals that a significant majority of Canadians now favor stricter immigration measures and reduced government spending on immigration programs. The survey results mark a notable shift in public sentiment regarding Canada's immigration landscape and could influence policy decisions moving forward.

This comprehensive analysis examines the poll findings, their implications for current and prospective immigrants, and what these changing attitudes mean for Canada's immigration future.

Key Poll Findings Summary

Understanding the Shift in Public Opinion

The 2026 Leger poll surveyed 2,500 Canadian adults across all provinces and territories between January and February 2026. The results indicate a measurable change in how Canadians view immigration policy, with several factors contributing to this shift.

Economic Pressures Drive Opinion Changes

Canadians are increasingly concerned about housing affordability, job market competition, and strain on public services. The poll reveals that 69% of respondents directly link immigration levels to housing costs, while 54% express concerns about job availability for Canadian citizens and permanent residents.

These economic pressures have created a more cautious approach to immigration expansion among the general public. Many respondents indicated that while they support immigration in principle, they believe the current pace needs adjustment to better align with Canada's capacity to integrate newcomers successfully.

Regional Variations in Support

The poll data shows significant regional differences in attitudes toward immigration policy:

Prairie Provinces show the strongest support for stricter measures at 73%, followed by Atlantic Canada at 68%. Ontario residents support restrictions at 65%, while Quebec shows 71% support. British Columbia demonstrates the most moderate stance at 59% support for stricter policies.

These regional variations reflect different economic conditions, population densities, and historical immigration patterns across Canada. Areas experiencing rapid population growth tend to show higher support for policy adjustments.

What Stricter Measures Could Include

The poll asked respondents about specific policy changes they would support. Understanding these preferences provides insight into potential future policy directions.

Skills-Based Selection Priority

An overwhelming 74% of Canadians support prioritizing immigrants with specific skills that address labor shortages. This suggests strong public backing for maintaining Canada's Express Entry system while potentially refining selection criteria to better match economic needs.

Respondents particularly favor prioritizing candidates with:

• Healthcare qualifications (78% support)
• Skilled trades certifications (71% support)
• Technology and engineering backgrounds (69% support)
• Teaching credentials (64% support)

Regional Distribution Requirements

More than half of poll participants (55%) support programs that require new immigrants to settle outside major urban centers like Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal. This reflects concerns about population concentration and its impact on housing and infrastructure in major cities.

The Provincial Nominee Program (PNP) already addresses some of these concerns, but public opinion suggests appetite for stronger measures to encourage regional settlement.

Temporary Worker Program Adjustments

Sixty-one percent of respondents favor limiting temporary foreign worker programs, particularly in sectors where Canadian workers are available. This sentiment reflects concerns about wage suppression and job displacement in certain industries.

Impact on Current Immigration Programs

These poll results could influence how the federal government approaches various immigration streams and spending priorities in 2026 and beyond.

Express Entry System Modifications

The Express Entry draws may see adjustments in selection criteria, with increased emphasis on specific occupational categories experiencing genuine shortages. The Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) could receive updates to better reflect public priorities around skills-based selection.

Current Express Entry candidates should focus on improving their language scores, obtaining Canadian work experience, and pursuing education in high-demand fields to maintain competitiveness under potentially stricter selection criteria.

Provincial Nominee Program Changes

Provincial and territorial governments may face pressure to demonstrate how their nominee selections address local economic needs and public concerns. PNP streams focusing on rural and northern immigration could receive increased federal support.

Prospective PNP applicants should research regional labor market needs carefully and consider smaller communities that actively recruit newcomers through enhanced incentive programs.

Family Reunification Considerations

While the poll didn't specifically address family class immigration, the overall sentiment toward spending restraint could affect processing times and program capacity. Current family sponsorship applications may face longer wait times if resources are redirected.

Economic Context Behind Public Opinion

Several economic factors contribute to the shifting public sentiment revealed in this Leger poll.

Housing Market Pressures

Canada's housing crisis continues to influence public opinion on immigration levels. The poll shows that 69% of Canadians see a direct connection between immigration rates and housing affordability challenges.

Major cities across Canada have experienced unprecedented housing price increases, creating affordability challenges for both newcomers and long-term residents. This housing pressure translates into political pressure for immigration policy adjustments.

Labor Market Dynamics

Despite ongoing labor shortages in specific sectors, 54% of poll respondents express concerns about job competition. This apparent contradiction reflects the complexity of Canada's labor market, where shortages in some areas coexist with unemployment in others.

The public appears to favor more targeted immigration that directly addresses specific shortages rather than general population growth through immigration.

Infrastructure and Services Capacity

Canadians increasingly question whether current infrastructure and public services can accommodate continued high immigration levels. Healthcare wait times, school overcrowding, and transportation congestion feature prominently in public discussions about immigration policy.

What This Means for Prospective Immigrants

The poll results suggest that Canada's immigration landscape may become more competitive and selective in the coming years.

Enhanced Competition Expected

Prospective immigrants should prepare for increased competition in all immigration streams. This means focusing on improving qualifications, language abilities, and Canadian connections to maintain competitiveness.

Investment in education, professional certifications, and language training becomes even more critical for immigration success. Candidates should also consider less popular destinations within Canada to improve their chances under regional programs.

Skills Alignment Importance

The strong public support for skills-based selection (74%) suggests that immigration success will increasingly depend on having qualifications that match Canada's economic needs. Researching in-demand occupations and obtaining relevant credentials becomes essential.

Healthcare professionals, skilled trades workers, and technology specialists appear particularly well-positioned based on public preferences expressed in the poll.

Regional Opportunities

The 55% support for regional distribution programs suggests opportunities for immigrants willing to settle outside major urban centers. Smaller communities often offer:

• Lower cost of living
• Faster integration opportunities
• Enhanced provincial nominee prospects
• Community support programs

Government Response and Policy Implications

While public opinion polls don't directly determine policy, they influence political decision-making, especially during election periods.

Potential Policy Adjustments

The federal government may respond to these poll results by:

• Adjusting annual immigration targets
• Modifying selection criteria emphasis
• Reallocating resources between programs
• Enhancing integration support measures

Balancing Economic Needs and Public Opinion

Canada faces the challenge of maintaining its economic competitiveness while addressing public concerns about immigration levels. The government must balance labor market needs, demographic challenges, and public sentiment.

Businesses requiring international talent may need to demonstrate more clearly how their recruitment addresses genuine shortages and benefits Canadian workers through complementary hiring or training programs.

Looking Ahead: Immigration in 2026 and Beyond

The Leger poll results suggest that Canada's immigration system will likely evolve toward greater selectivity and regional focus.

Increased Emphasis on Integration

Public support for immigration often correlates with successful integration outcomes. Future policy may emphasize pre-arrival preparation, enhanced settlement services, and outcome measurement to build public confidence.

Credential recognition processes, language training programs, and employment bridging initiatives could receive increased attention and resources.

Technology and Efficiency Improvements

To address public concerns about spending while maintaining immigration levels, the government may invest in digital transformation of immigration services. Automated processing, online services, and data analytics could improve efficiency while reducing costs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Will Canada reduce immigration numbers because of this poll?

While the poll shows public support for stricter measures, immigration levels depend on multiple factors including economic needs, demographic trends, and international commitments. The government will likely focus on improving selection criteria rather than dramatically reducing numbers.

How will this affect Express Entry draws in 2026?

Express Entry may see adjustments toward more occupation-specific draws and potentially higher score requirements. Candidates should focus on improving their profiles through additional education, work experience, or provincial nominations.

Are family sponsorship programs at risk?

Family reunification remains a cornerstone of Canadian immigration policy. However, processing times and annual allocations could be affected if resources are redirected toward economic programs that have stronger public support.

What regions offer the best opportunities for new immigrants now?

Provinces and territories actively recruiting immigrants through enhanced programs include Atlantic Canada, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and northern communities. These regions often provide additional settlement support and clearer pathways to permanent residence.

Should I delay my immigration application based on these results?

Delaying applications is generally not advisable, as immigration policies can change in either direction. Current applicants should continue with their plans while preparing for potentially increased competition by strengthening their profiles.

Conclusion

The 2026 Leger poll reflects evolving Canadian attitudes toward immigration policy, driven by economic pressures and infrastructure concerns. While the results suggest appetite for more selective approaches, they don't indicate opposition to immigration itself.

Prospective immigrants can navigate this changing landscape by focusing on in-demand skills, considering regional opportunities, and preparing thoroughly for increased competition. The key lies in aligning personal immigration goals with Canada's expressed economic and social priorities.

Stay informed about the latest developments in Canadian immigration policy and how they might affect your plans. Bookmark Immigration2Canada.com for up-to-date analysis, policy changes, and expert guidance on navigating Canada's evolving immigration landscape in 2026 and beyond.

About Author